← Search

Julie Yang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 7W–8L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history15 matches
L
Maureen Collins / Jan Smith
2025-08-21 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Redding
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-3
L
2025-08-14 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Deborah Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-17 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Barbara Friesen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-12 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Redding
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-18 · MAC-Lekas/Walker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Crisan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2023-10-08 · MAC-Lekas/Walker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Papadimas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2022-10-02 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Friesen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2022-09-17 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcy Patton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2021-10-16 · MAC-Yang · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Friesen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2021-10-09 · MAC-Yang · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-09-18 · MAC-Yang · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2018-11-03 · MAC-Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Remington
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–4L · 36.5% of games
6.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 87% of the time
#3 Doubles
87%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams