Search

Margaret Huck

BRUSH PRAIRIE, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
120 matches · 41W–79L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
1 of 755

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 3.0, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020192021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Margaret has gone from the 1st to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.3% of games
3.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 36.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.6% of games
6.0
35%
14W–26L · 43.8% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 32.3% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
W
Carol Kviz / Cheryl Rodakowski
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Lowenberg
0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 78% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Anita Beck / Rita DeWeese
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Hicks
0.022about as expected — took 63% of games against 68% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Marianne Conroy / Theresa Luthi
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gayle Bingham
0.096below expectation — took 41% of games against 71% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Anh Pham / Anita Beck
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gayle Bingham
0.118below expectation — took 25% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Stella Snethlage / Peter Snethlagemixed
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph McDonough
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Trudy Wallace / Carel James
2026-02-19 · #5 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Walker
0.017below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Nancy Economopoulos / Thomas MacDonaldmixed
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Huck
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Julie Henthorn / Mary Jane Toolson
2026-02-12 · #5 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Shelley
0.029below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Rob DiNapoli / Erin Craigmixed
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Ogilvie
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
MaryLynn Murphy / Theresa Brown
2026-02-05 · #5 Doubles · 4.0 · with JUDY MCLENNAN
0.023below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Thomas MacDonald / Stella Snethlagemixed
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Ringsdorf
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Wendy Zimmer / Kathleen Novarro
2026-01-29 · #6 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Shelley
+0.078better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.