← Search

Rita DeWeese

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 26W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rita DeWeese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-05-09 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim DeWeese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-08 · MPRC-Herbert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Herbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · MPRC-Herbert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · MPRC-Herbert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim DeWeese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-24 · MPRC-Herbert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie McDevitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-25 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crispin Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-21 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Rowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-02 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-05 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phyllis Ghazi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-19 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with June Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-07-11 · MPRC-Su · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim DeWeese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.8% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.1% of games
7.0mixed
27.1%
13W–35L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams