← Search

Anne Mangan

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 62W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Mangan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-05-08 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-30 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-17 · MAC-Korkowski · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Eiseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-15 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-13 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Wheary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-25 · MAC-Korkowski · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Eiseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-19 · MAC-Korkowski · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Cooney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-18 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Neighbors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-17 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Neighbors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
65.3%
32W–17L · 57.5% of games
3.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 32% of games
6.0
35.1%
13W–24L · 42.1% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova