Search

James Lawrence

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
169 matches · 102W–67L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.5
40 of 55
OR · 3.5
564 of 735

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, James has gone from the 25th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
12W–12L · 49.2% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
7.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.8% of games
6.0mixed
70.7%
29W–12L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
56.9%
33W–25L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chiharu Olsson
+0.000below expectation — took 54% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Shu
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Gretchen Wagner / Christopher Grahammixed
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaoru Nelson
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaoru Nelson
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Blebea
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaoru Nelson
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Pandya
+0.064better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Vicino
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Andy Griggs / Arron Heriford
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Pandya
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-12-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jacqueline Babb Milligan
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chiharu Olsson
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Christopher Graham / Bruce Yang
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Planck
0.015below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.