← Search

Steve Elmer

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 62W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Elmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-07-18 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Elmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Elmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jihoon Bang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sreenivasa Rao Pitchuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sreenivasa Rao Pitchuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-21 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd McConachie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rodney Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-10-19 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jinmi Kemple mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-13 · SAC-Harwood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rundle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-07-11 · SAC-Harwood · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rundle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
46.6%
41W–47L · 47.9% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 40.8% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams