Search

Rob Chandler

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 29W–34L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
103 of 399
OR · 3.5
203 of 735

Rob is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams23 teams · 2017–2026
IRV-Laurent/Hoerster
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
IRV-Harris
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2026
IRV-Kayser/Chandler
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
IRV-Laurent/Martinez
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
IRV-Steinhoff/Laurent
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
IRV-Laurent/Steinhoff
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rob has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rob has gone from the 74th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 52.2% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-06-07 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Hoerster
+0.022better than expected — took 58% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
Steve Elmer / Sreenivasa Rao Pitchuka
2026-05-31 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John LaBarca
+0.040better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Streich
0.014about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Trout Hartung / Robert Meyer
2026-04-05 · IRV-Laurent/Hoerster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bean
+0.035better than expected — took 58% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Beall
+0.043better than expected — took 44% of games against 30% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Jon Bryant / Sam Lumetta
2026-02-28 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bean
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Johnson
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-24 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with ANTHONY PEPE
+0.046better than expected — took 63% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-11 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark McGinnis
0.049below expectation — took 50% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark McGinnis
+0.009better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · IRV-Harris · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Gordon
0.047below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-04 · IRV-Harris · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Diess
+0.036better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.