IRV-Kayser/Chandler

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36

Rob Chandler

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.29

Steve Harris

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.18

Aaron Kohn

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.16

Jacob Johnson

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5

3.14

Christopher Kayser

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.07

ANTHONY PEPE

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.06

Scott Beall

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.04

David Bean

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

2.88

Stephen Backer

usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Rob Chandler

29W–34L career

0%96%4%

3.36

3.5

Steve Harris

68W–64L career

1%98%1%

3.29

3.5

Aaron Kohn

14W–30L career

5%94%0%

3.18

3.5

Jacob Johnson

8W–23L career

12%87%1%

3.16

3.5

Christopher Kayser

24W–28L career

14%86%1%

3.14

3.5

ANTHONY PEPE

24W–36L career

24%76%0%

3.07

3.5

Scott Beall

29W–41L career

22%78%0%

3.06

3.5

David Bean

52W–32L career

25%75%0%

3.04

Stephen Backer

14W–8L career

0%91%9%

2.88

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.