← Search

Kara Petracca

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 75W–41L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Kara Petracca to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-09-11 · VTC-Simpson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Simpson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jocelyn Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · VTC-Simpson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Fish mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Fish mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Simpson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · VTC-Simpson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean McKinnie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-05 · VTC-Simpson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 57.5% of games
3.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
86.4%
19W–3L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams