Search

Kara Petracca

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
111 matches · 71W–40L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Camas · 3.5
12 of 25
WA · 3.5
881 of 1209

Kara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kara has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kara has gone from the 8th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 57.5% of games
3.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
+0.055better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Simpson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Fish
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Peter Jablonski / Carrie Mccaskillmixed
2026-07-11 · VTC-Simpson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean McKinnie
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
John Liao / Debbie Spitzermixed
2026-07-05 · VTC-Simpson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Murray
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Isabel Nazareth / Bonnie Song
2026-06-30 · Baseline Baddies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
+0.038better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · VTC-Simpson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · ET-Tanca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dwiggins
0.024below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelia Ryan
+0.020about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · ET-Tanca · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dwiggins
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.