Search

Jennifer Potter

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
90 matches · 37W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
196 of 399
OR · 3.5
388 of 735

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams35 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 32nd to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 68.7% of games
3.5
38.1%
16W–26L · 44.8% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Webb/Mang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
+0.019about as expected — took 20% of games against 24% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Webb/Mang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
+0.010about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Karla Hendrickson / Matt Snydermixed
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Dickinson
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Webb/Mang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
+0.015better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Jill Gardner / Lucia Parker
2026-02-28 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JaReda Webb
0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lowthian
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Smith
0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-18 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Skip Potter
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.