Teams

WHRC-Webb

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Colleen Docktor
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.45
Karen Harlow
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Janet Ha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Whitney Mam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Parul Saxena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Mihee Park
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.11
Mihye Ko
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
3.11
Lauren Mang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Amanda Lowthian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Xia Yuan
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.86
Margaret Convery
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Colleen Docktor
35W–26L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Karen Harlow
79W–58L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Potter
37W–53L career
2%98%1%
3.25
3.5
Whitney Mam
30W–27L career
not enough data
3.5
Parul Saxena
36W–43L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Mihee Park
146W–88L career
0%19%81%
3.21
3
Mihye Ko
98W–51L career
0%50%50%
3.11
3.5
Lauren Mang
34W–53L career
11%89%0%
3.11
3.5
Amanda Lowthian
17W–39L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Xia Yuan
53W–62L career
15%85%0%
3.09
3
Margaret Convery
41W–41L career
0%97%3%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.