WHRC-Webb

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54

Stanley Mo

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.46

Dalika Crawford

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.25

Todd Khozein

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.25

Jennifer Potter

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.22

Jason Floyd

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

3.15

Simon Lofts

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.11

Lauren Mang

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.10

Amanda Lowthian

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.02

Scott Dickinson

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.91

Stephany Mo

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.87

Liz Theeuws

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.71

Nic Hawken

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Stanley Mo

37W–84L career

0%73%27%

3.54

3.5

Dalika Crawford

60W–40L career

0%87%13%

3.46

3.5

Todd Khozein

52W–59L career

1%99%0%

3.25

3.5

Jennifer Potter

37W–53L career

2%98%1%

3.25

Jason Floyd

84W–49L career

0%17%83%

3.22

3.5

Simon Lofts

35W–51L career

13%86%1%

3.15

3.5

Lauren Mang

34W–53L career

11%89%0%

3.11

3.5

Amanda Lowthian

17W–39L career

13%87%0%

3.10

Scott Dickinson

105W–81L career · type A

0%77%23%

3.02

Stephany Mo

54W–49L career

0%95%5%

2.91

Liz Theeuws

29W–59L career

0%96%4%

2.87

Nic Hawken

2W–10L career · type S

4%96%1%

2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.