← Search

Michelle Zawadzki

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 74W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Zawadzki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Kuerbis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Julie LaMontagne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Matteri championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Char Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kelsey McGinnis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 64.6% of games
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 69.4% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova