Search

Michelle Zawadzki

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
107 matches · 74W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
44%
stay 3.5
56%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 82% stay · 18% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.51 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
24 of 399
OR · 3.5
58 of 735

Michelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2016–2026
IRV-LaBarca/Nolan
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
IRV-LaBarca/Nolan
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
N OR-IRV-Zawadzki
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
Rollier/Nolan
2025 One Doubles · 3.5 Women
2025
IRV-LaBarca/Zawadzki
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
IRV-Towle/LaBarca
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Michelle has gone from the 49th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 64.6% of games
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 69.4% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
+0.028better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Kuerbis
0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey McGinnis
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
+0.053better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · with Julie LaMontagne
0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · with Heather Matteri
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
+0.010about as expected — took 54% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Matteri
+0.018better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Char Riley
0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Bonnie Briggs-Ramm / Michelle Dombek
2026-02-15 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaMontagne
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-08-16 · N OR-IRV-Zawadzki · #1 Doubles · with Kelsey McGinnis
0.057below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.