Search

Joan OByrne

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
69 matches · 50W–19L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
86%
stay 3.5
14%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
69 of 399
OR · 3.5
146 of 735

Joan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2006–2026
NOR-THPRD-Agrawal
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
THPRD-Agrawal
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
Moorpark Acing Gracefully
2025 Usta Adult 55 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 7.0
2025
V- LLW Moorpark Acing Gracefully Wager
2025 Usta Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE
2025
Mission Oaks Wrecking Balls
2025 Usta Adult 40 & Over Weekday - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD
2025
Moorpark Acing Gracefully
2025 Usta Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joan has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Joan has gone from the 98th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 59.2% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 55.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-06-06 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shweta Agrawal
0.028below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ying-Chieh Chen
0.019about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Sarah Bracelin / Marie Claire Dunne
2026-04-19 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai-Anh Nguyen
0.018below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai-Anh Nguyen
0.033below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maya Mori
0.018about as expected — took 71% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-23 · THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wenping Xue
0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dolores Corley
0.081below expectation — took 29% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Deva May / Kim Tavasoli
2025-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Kapur
+0.004better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Vicky Modglin / Anita Spraggs
2025-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
+0.107better than expected — took 92% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Stella Dumlao-Idea / Rayya Cooke
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Trombley
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Lisa Marnell / Ann Francisco
2025-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Alejandre
0.021below expectation — took 46% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Foley / Sarah Lowychamps
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Lynne F Krueger
0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.