Teams

IRV-LaBarca/Nolan

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Michelle Zawadzki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Kristen LaBarca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Dana Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Brooke Kuerbis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Heather Matteri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Teresa Chan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Julie LaMontagne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Char Riley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Julia Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Kelly Norling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Marissa Franck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Renee Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Blythe Knott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Wendy Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Erin Gleason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michelle Zawadzki
74W–33L career
0%75%25%
3.51
3.5
Kristen LaBarca
65W–38L career
0%90%10%
3.44
3.5
Dana Nolan
72W–25L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Brooke Kuerbis
93W–31L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Heather Matteri
58W–30L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Teresa Chan
60W–20L career
0%99%1%
3.34
3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
4%95%1%
3.23
3.5
Kelly Norling
68W–45L career
2%98%0%
3.22
3.5
Marissa Franck
33W–27L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Renee Schwartz
23W–21L career
5%95%0%
3.19
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3.5
Blythe Knott
22W–48L career
13%87%0%
3.12
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
24%76%0%
3.07
3.5
Erin Gleason
43W–17L career
30%70%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.