← Search

Emily Shue

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
134 matches · 82W–52L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
61%
stay 3.5
39%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.48 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
6 of 39
WA · 3.5
118 of 1209

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 40th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 59.1% of games
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 63% of games
3.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 65.2% of games
3.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
W
Christine Nguyen / Jennifer Pultz
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Maya Mori / Olivia Newcomb
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Damiano
−0.019below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Petracca
+0.055better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Simpson
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Monica Ao / Jonathan Howemixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Shue
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Shue
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 78% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Mark Lee / Teresa Zhaomixed
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Murray
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Blunt
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adriana McCord
−0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Naun Yvonne Kim / Kara Kraft
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Damiano
−0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.