Search

Teresa Zhao

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 46W–34L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
23%
down to 3.0
77%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Camas · 3.5
24 of 25
WA · 3.5
1159 of 1209

Teresa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Teresa has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Teresa has gone from the 7th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
71.9%
23W–9L · 60.4% of games
3.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.040below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · VTC-Watkins/Savage · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Lee
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · ET-Tanca · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily James
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · ET-Tanca · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dwiggins
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · ET-Tanca · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.073better than expected — took 71% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Brittany Donnelly
2026-05-01 · ET-Tanca · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelia Ryan
0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.014about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 2-2
L
Sarah Shin / Monica Nguyen
2026-03-28 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Petracca
0.047below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · ET-Zhao/Ryan 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Gardner
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · ET-Zhao/Ryan 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Pickens
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · ET-Zhao/Ryan 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.039below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.