← Search

Tila Parker

Gresham, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 36W–23L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Tila Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-12 · LCC-Ashraf/Hoang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kai Meltzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Hevia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Hevia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Freda Bax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-08 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Newcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryke Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-07 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Asbridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-18 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 71.5% of games
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 47.9% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova