← Search

Katherine McMillan

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 49W–15L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Katherine McMillan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-12 · WHRC-Petersen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neville Mehta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Dusicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Mang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Dusicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-31 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Dusicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-28 · WHRC-Petersen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-25 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nic Hawken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-20 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Dusicka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-22 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Craighill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-08 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Kopprasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-18 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayna Jahnke-Corwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
16W–0L · 69.7% of games
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 61.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams