← Search

Kim Hevia

Gresham, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 3W–43L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Kim Hevia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-13 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nozomi Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tila Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tila Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Hevia/Sanchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marje Ferek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
3.5
2.9%
1W–34L · 31.6% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal