GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27

Gretchen Newcomb

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.23

Jennifer Pultz

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.14

Sarah Robertson

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.11

Paula Conway

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.10

Betty Roux

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

2.96

Catherine Greenblatt

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.83

Karen Kraus

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.81

Kim Hevia

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.67

Megan Clifford

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Gretchen Newcomb

49W–70L career

1%99%0%

3.27

3.5

Jennifer Pultz

112W–67L career

1%99%0%

3.23

3.5

Sarah Robertson

72W–98L career

7%93%0%

3.14

3.5

Paula Conway

48W–75L career

10%90%0%

3.11

3.5

Betty Roux

101W–106L career · type A

14%86%0%

3.10

Catherine Greenblatt

52W–81L career

0%87%13%

2.96

Karen Kraus

79W–102L career

0%98%2%

2.83

Kim Hevia

3W–42L career

0%99%1%

2.81

Megan Clifford

65W–60L career

7%93%0%

2.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.