Teams

CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Cori Wilson
usually #1 Singles 85%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 3.5
3.38
Michele Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Clevenger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Gretchen Newcomb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Pultz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sarah Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Paula Conway
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Kim Hevia
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Cori Wilson
76W–20L career
0%25%75%
3.69
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%96%4%
3.38
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%2%
3.33
3.5
Gretchen Newcomb
49W–70L career
1%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.23
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
7%93%0%
3.14
3.5
Paula Conway
48W–75L career
10%90%0%
3.11
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%87%13%
2.96
3
Kim Hevia
3W–42L career
0%99%1%
2.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.