← Search

Karen McNairy

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 49W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen McNairy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-05-30 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-24 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-0
L
2026-04-05 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-03 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike McNairy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · MPRC-Dombek/Budnick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Dombek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · MPRC-Dombek/Budnick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Ahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 41.1% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 42.9% of games
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.5% of games
8.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 52.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer