Teams

8/26

Credit Holds · NO

16 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / BRITISH COLUMBIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Andrea Robertson
published 4
3.64
Marc DeSantis
published 4
3.44
John Jay
published 4
3.43
Craig Mills
published 3.5
3.28
John Wallin
published 3.5
3.25
Corin Nies
published 3.5
Jane Paulsen
published 3.5
Johan Hong
published 3.5
Lyann Nguyen
published 3.5
Nichole Anglin
published 3.5
3.19
Joseph Gonzales
published 3.5
3.13
Dirk Jacobs
published 3.5
3.07
Jamie Heberlein
published 3.5
3.06
Karen McNairy
published 3.5
2.86
June Xiao
published 2.5
2.62
Jack Crossen
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Andrea Robertson
92W–64L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Marc DeSantis
56W–37L career
11%88%0%
3.64
4
John Jay
39W–24L career
50%50%0%
3.44
3.5
Craig Mills
58W–89L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%5%
3.28
3.5
Corin Nies
14W–17L career · type S
6%91%3%
3.25
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
3.5
Johan Hong
79W–53L career
not enough data
3.5
Lyann Nguyen
59W–44L career
not enough data
3.5
Nichole Anglin
81W–65L career
not enough data
3.5
Joseph Gonzales
5W–5L career
10%88%2%
3.19
3.5
Dirk Jacobs
53W–32L career
20%79%1%
3.13
3.5
Jamie Heberlein
45W–47L career
28%72%1%
3.07
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
20%80%0%
3.06
2.5
June Xiao
50W–25L career
0%0%100%
2.86
3
Jack Crossen
33W–50L career
21%78%1%
2.62

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.