WHRC-Grilley/Adcock

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94

Chiho Cronk

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5

3.90

Carrie Fisher

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.74

Sharon Grilley

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.67

Rebecca Jones

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.66

Donna Roisom

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.54

Marie Picard

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.50

Judi Babcock

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5

3.45

Kana Wakamatsu

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.44

Elizabeth Domagalski

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.06

Karen McNairy

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Chiho Cronk

92W–68L career

29%71%0%

3.94

Carrie Fisher

135W–80L career

0%96%4%

3.90

Sharon Grilley

37W–33L career

4%95%1%

3.74

Rebecca Jones

65W–61L career

4%96%0%

3.67

Donna Roisom

100W–85L career

6%94%0%

3.66

Marie Picard

128W–96L career

24%76%0%

3.54

3.5

Judi Babcock

128W–57L career

0%82%18%

3.50

Kana Wakamatsu

60W–63L career

48%52%0%

3.45

Elizabeth Domagalski

72W–47L career

52%48%0%

3.44

3.5

Karen McNairy

49W–62L career

20%80%0%

3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.