← Search

Deborah Wood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CORTE MADERA, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history22 matches
L
2025-05-08 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-25 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Mangan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-18 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-04-10 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Neighbors
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-4
L
2024-05-10 · MAC-Lekas/Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-05-02 · MAC-Lekas/Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-03-28 · MAC-Lekas/Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Papadimas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-03-22 · MAC-Lekas/Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-04-20 · MAC-Walker/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-03-28 · MAC-Walker/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2023-03-24 · MAC-Walker/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2020-01-19 · MAC-Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Lekas
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.1% of games
6.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 68% of the time
#2 Doubles
68%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer