Search

Ellen Wood

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
122 matches · 43W–79L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
55%
down to 2.5
45%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 33% down · 67% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.53. Higher than today’s 2.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
354 of 357
OR · 3.0
591 of 600

Ellen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams64 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ellen has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Ellen has gone from the 12th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 29.1% of games
3.0
40%
8W–12L · 45% of games
6.0
38.6%
22W–35L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
L
Adele Bostwick / Kathy Watanabe
2026-07-09 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Milan
0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Lindsay Freed / Pat Clemonsmixed
2026-06-27 · MAC-Boehm · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fergus Caldicott
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Casimo
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Walker
+0.019below expectation — took 0% of games against 10% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Carol Bremner / Shirley Rawlinson
2026-06-04 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Sally Sullivan / Raquel Rich
2026-05-08 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Mangan
0.030below expectation — took 59% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Joan Campf / Barbara Maughan
2026-04-23 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Lynne Bowman / Shawn West
2026-04-02 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Maron
0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Robbi Matarrese / Susan Putterman
2026-03-24 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Jensen
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Lynda Borja / Linda Harrold
2026-03-20 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
0.024below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Tuni Stecker / Gayle Bingham
2026-03-12 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
+0.039better than expected — took 45% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · MAC-Younie/Papadimas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Kubik
0.017below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.