Search

Phyllis Ghazi

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
71 matches · 19W–52L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.55
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
25%
down to 2.5
75%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 15% down · 85% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.58. Higher than today’s 2.55 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
350 of 357
OR · 3.0
583 of 600

Phyllis is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Phyllis has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Phyllis has gone from the 7th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.7% of games
3.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 38.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.1% of games
2.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Court · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Crawford
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Libby Anderson / James Troliomixed
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Court · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Keene
+0.000about as expected — took 28% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Jerin Boyer / Becki Garrow
2026-06-13 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Boyarshinova
0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Bienen
0.008below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laya Motahari
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Hannah Hart / Elena Knepprath
2026-04-25 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
+0.044better than expected — took 61% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Ying Deng / Shuping Li
2026-04-03 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Anna Kim / Lisa Johnston-Smith
2026-03-14 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Erika Anderson / Lauren Kimmel
2026-03-01 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
0.012below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
+0.037better than expected — took 41% of games against 30% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Colleen Atherton / Nichole Dewson
2026-01-10 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
+0.063better than expected — took 71% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Cory Sebastian / Mazyar Afsharmixed
2025-12-06 · N OR-WHRC-Davidson · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ed Keene
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.