← Search

Phyllis Ghazi

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
72 matches · 19W–53L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Phyllis Ghazi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-08-09 · WHRC-Court · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andy Ostrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Court · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Court · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Keene mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-13 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Boyarshinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Bienen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-31 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laya Motahari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-14 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · WHRC-Palmer/Alfonso · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Moisant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.7% of games
3.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 38.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 14.3% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.1% of games
2.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova