← Search

Amy Hicks

Battle Ground, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 58W–67L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Amy Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VTC-Darling · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Burak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert More mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert More mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Araujo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Barrett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Tiesenga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · VTC-Barrett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anamaria Musterer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-24 · VTC-Barrett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Elizabeth Schaller de la Cova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Darling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tuni Stecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Pasmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Weyand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams96 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50.9%
27W–26L · 50.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–13L · 27.7% of games
6.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.6% of games
7.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams