← Search

Miriam Habafy

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 106W–84L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Miriam Habafy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
W
2026-09-13 · LCC-Wellman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Arp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
L
2026-07-26 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · VTC-Simpson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · VTC-Simpson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean McKinnie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Michelle Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Puffer Fish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.5% of games
3.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 60.5% of games
3.5
57.6%
49W–36L · 51.7% of games
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
40 matches
#1 Singles
21%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe