Search

Carol Kviz

Hillsboro, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
100 matches · 21W–79L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
32%
stay 2.5
68%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 75% stay · 25% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.45. Lower than today’s 2.54 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 2.5
29 of 61

Carol is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carol has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Carol has gone from the 21st to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
20%
3W–12L · 29.8% of games
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 49.4% of games
3.0
21.9%
7W–25L · 33.8% of games
6.0
20.4%
10W–39L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
Shirley Rawlinson / MaryAnn Nickel
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Minhhang Tran
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Claire C Gates / Barbara Maughan
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Shackleton
+0.044better than expected — took 37% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Mary Jane Toolson / Melodie Seelbinder
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laureen Thorsen
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marie Kane
0.068below expectation — took 0% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Tomoko Langworthy / Nancy Lowenberg
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Swift
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Wales
+0.133better than expected — took 100% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nancy Lowenberg / Margaret Huck
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Rodakowski
+0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 22% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Barbara Lolich / Cindy Rowe
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Sullivan
+0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Marianne Conroy / Patty Mamula
2025-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joyce Swift
+0.050better than expected — took 52% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Ellen Wood / Ellin Johnson
2025-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Yamada
0.059below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Ann Burns / Colleen Hamilton
2025-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marion Godfrey
+0.007below expectation — took 8% of games against 20% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Marianne Conroy / Theresa Luthi
2025-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with JoCarol Nesset-Sale
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.