Search

Tomoko Langworthy

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
118 matches · 50W–68L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
38 of 52
WA · 3.0
698 of 755

Tomoko is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams56 teams · 2013–2026
CGM-Pasmore/Weyand
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
CGM-Watson/Perlmutter
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
CGM-Watson/Dolbey
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
CGM-Richards/Weyand
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2025
VTC-Olson
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
VTC-Olson
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tomoko has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Tomoko has gone from the 7th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.4% of games
6.0
31.6%
12W–26L · 43.9% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 46% of games
6.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
W
Carol Kviz / Joyce Swift
2026-05-15 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Lowenberg
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Judy Friedman / Barbara Maughan
2026-05-08 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tamara Phillips
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-20 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy McCoy
0.035below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-14 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Chen
0.041below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Renea Johnson / Amy Pickens
2026-02-22 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chana Dolbey
+0.020better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kelly McDonald / Malia Laport
2026-02-07 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lowenberg
0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Van Chinh Bui / Chili He
2026-01-24 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chana Dolbey
0.014below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Beverly Reed / Beth Gebstadt
2026-01-03 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chana Dolbey
+0.043better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Cara Partch / Kimberly Shaffer
2025-11-22 · CGM-Watson/Perlmutter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chana Dolbey
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · CGM-Watson/Perlmutter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chana Dolbey
+0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-10-25 · CGM-Watson/Perlmutter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tamara Phillips
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.