Search

Chana Dolbey

BATTLE GROUND, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 34W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
624 of 960

Chana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chana has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Chana has gone from the 47th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
60%
27W–18L · 55% of games
6.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
Renea Johnson / Amy Pickens
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
+0.018better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Laura Baughman
2026-01-31 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.018below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Van Chinh Bui / Chili He
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Beverly Reed / Beth Gebstadt
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Cara Partch / Kimberly Shaffer
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Wendy Smith / Marcy Patton
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kay Hallmark / Priscilla Connolly
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Watson
0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Watson
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Watson
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Wendy Buchanan / Yasmine Foroud
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
0.022about as expected — took 75% of games against 74% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.