Search

Beverly Reed

PORTLAND, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 25W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
17%
down to 2.5
83%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.60. Higher than today’s 2.58 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
PORTLAND · 3.0
15 of 16
OR · 3.0
582 of 605

Beverly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Beverly has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Beverly has gone from the 7th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 44.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
Jill Ainsworth / Kathy Stahl
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yen Nguyen
+0.051better than expected — took 35% of games against 22% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Jennifer Salnas / Jen West
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with McKaila Allcorn
+0.043better than expected — took 20% of games against 14% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Gross
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Lynda Borja / Tamee Baffaro
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Zhitlovsky
0.006about as expected — took 39% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Diana Cheng / Jihyun Kang
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandee Schroer
0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Gebstadt
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Kristin Case / Trish Peters
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Harrison
0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vanessa Gallant
0.009below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vanessa Gallant
+0.023about as expected — took 20% of games against 22% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Rosenbloom
+0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Gay
0.019below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cordelia Tilghman
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.