Search

Trish Peters

Battle Ground, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 40W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 2.5
89%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.62. Higher than today’s 2.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
742 of 755

Trish is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Trish has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Trish has gone from the 16th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.5% of games
3.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 37.2% of games
6.0
32%
8W–17L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
44.1%
15W–19L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Beverly Reed / Elizabeth Harrison
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Case
+0.015better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Denise Butchee / Greg Henkhausmixed
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Andrew Oh / Ann Jensenmixed
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Steve DeKlotz / Sarah Larsonmixed
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Michael McNulty / Anne Milanmixed
2025-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Peters
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Kylie Kim / Woojin Lee
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Vail
0.023below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Stacy Seow / Xizhen Palmer
2025-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Gwin
0.015about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Vail
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Pelton
+0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.