Search

Pamela Grant

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
79 matches · 34W–45L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.0
99%
stay 2.5
0%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
34 of 34
OR · 2.5
60 of 61

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
WHRC-Tudorache/Lee
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 5.0 Mixed
2027
WHRC-Daigneault
2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 5.0 Mixed
2026
WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women
2026
WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women
2026
WHRC-Webb 6.0
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
WHRC-Court/Davidson
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been a steady 2.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.02.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Pamela has gone from the 63rd to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 47.8% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.4% of games
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
41%
16W–23L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-11 · WHRC-Daigneault · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nasser Khan
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Troy KonigWilcox / Sanam Dowlatdadmixed
2026-07-05 · WHRC-Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nasser Khan
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 24% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Katalin Wiggins / Wendy Wolf
2026-05-30 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mardell Mikolaj
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Xiaobo Dai / Angela Keating
2026-05-15 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mardell Mikolaj
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Katherine FitzGibbon / Julie McDevitt
2026-05-01 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mardell Mikolaj
0.017below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Michelle Hodges / Heidi Seinige
2026-03-29 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Lee
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Nicole Matson / Kimberly Shaffer
2026-02-06 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mardell Mikolaj
+0.026better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Brenda Elliott / Molly Tanen
2026-01-16 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Lee
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Amy Tam-naulty / Susan Grabe
2026-01-04 · WHRC-Tudorache/Senashova · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Crispin Wong
+0.014better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Shelby Tweto / Angela Winter
2025-06-21 · WHRC-Court/Davidson · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elma Blum
+0.007about as expected — took 58% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Emma Morgan-mcleod / Saerom Yoo
2025-06-07 · WHRC-Court/Davidson · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Davidson
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Ada Chang / Pujitha Davuluri
2025-05-04 · WHRC-Court/Davidson · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Mccollister
0.042below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.