← Search

Denise Butchee

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 42W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Denise Butchee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-08-01 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pat Clemons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-21 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Koenigsberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-14 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathan Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · SAC-Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jann Purdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-21 · SAC-Brady/Andersen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jeremy Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-15 · SAC-Brady/Andersen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · SAC-Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · SAC-Koeberl · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with April Mayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · SAC-Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeane Anastas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-21 · SAC-Brady/Andersen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Henkhaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · SAC-Koeberl · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
88%
22W–3L · 65.1% of games
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 43% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.4% of games
2.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 64.3% of games
6.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer