Search

April Mayers

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
55 matches · 23W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.0
40 of 47
OR · 3.0
538 of 600

April is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

April has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, April has gone from the 32nd to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
42.6%
20W–27L · 46% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Andersen
+0.018better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeane Anastas
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Andersen
+0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JEAN CHEN
+0.017about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Nancy Lo / Sarah Wang
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lina Gao
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Erin Donovan / Joyce Delacruz
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeane Anastas
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Rhonda Baker / Kelley Schultz
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diana Crawford
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Butchee
+0.024better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Hiroe Felix / Kristin Case
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jann Purdy
0.036below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diana Crawford
0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Delena Palena / Larissa Kazantsev
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jann Purdy
+0.013about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.