Search

Elizabeth Large

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 19W–48L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
248 of 357
OR · 3.0
413 of 600

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elizabeth has gone from the 1st to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
18.9%
7W–30L · 39.3% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.1% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-06-14 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
+0.010about as expected — took 39% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · PTC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rudy Martinez
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · PTC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Ogden
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · PTC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Ogden
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
0.021below expectation — took 31% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 5-2
W
Karoline Brock / Shannon Wagner
2026-03-14 · MAC-Nearn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Lance
+0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Nearn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-31 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bourland
0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Linda Coburn / Tamara Phillips
2026-01-11 · MAC-Nearn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Phyllis Ghazi / Sharon Arendes
2025-11-30 · THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Henshaw
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.