← Search

Elizabeth Large

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 19W–48L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Large to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-06-14 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Bigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · PTC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rudy Martinez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · PTC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Ogden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-04 · PTC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Ogden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · MAC-Nearn/Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Nearn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Lance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Nearn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · MAC-Nearn · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bourland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-11 · MAC-Nearn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-30 · THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Henshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
18.9%
7W–30L · 39.3% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.1% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova