Teams

PTC-Leedy

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.46 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Damon Ogden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Joel Naumoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Diane Malhotra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Mark Hudspeth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Dana McKillop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Tuan Truong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Rudy Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.76
Elizabeth Large
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Mike Delman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Damon Ogden
86W–83L career
1%99%0%
3.75
3.5
Joel Naumoff
60W–31L career
2%97%1%
3.27
3.5
Diane Malhotra
46W–26L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Mark Hudspeth
5W–10L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Dana McKillop
22W–63L career
2%98%0%
3.25
3.5
Tuan Truong
30W–64L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–141L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
19%81%0%
3.06
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
33%67%0%
3.00
3
Elizabeth Large
19W–48L career
1%99%0%
2.76
3
Mike Delman
4W–8L career
8%87%5%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.