Search

Qin Lian

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
55%
stay 3.0
45%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
12 of 52
OR · 3.0
137 of 600

Qin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
MPRC-Hua/Amarga-Lee
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
MPRC-Amarga-Lee
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
N OR-MPRC-Mitchell
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MPRC-Brinck/Dixit
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
MPRC-Hua/Clark
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
MPRC-Bennett
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Qin has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Qin has gone from the 62nd to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 59.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-06-14 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Feifei Chen
0.010about as expected — took 61% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Jill Gardner / Emily James
2026-06-07 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Roth
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Sandra Miller / Crystal Ounaphom
2026-05-16 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Yutan
+0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Staci Kristin / Andria Shirkchamps
2026-04-12 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · with Stephanie Hoover
0.024below expectation — took 54% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Wendy Simons / Lora Lord
2026-03-29 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alix Loeber
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Julie Blodgett / Carrie Gross
2026-01-04 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Douglas
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · MPRC-Hua/Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ye Jiang
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · MPRC-Hua/Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kai Lin
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-01 · MPRC-Hua/Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kai Lin
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Lo / Jessie Trieumixed
2025-07-26 · MPRC-Bennett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Qiming Wang
+0.000below expectation — took 67% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-20 · MPRC-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ye Jiang
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.