Search

Jessie Trieu

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
19 matches · 10W–9L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
45 of 52
OR · 3.0
468 of 600

Jessie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
MAC-Nguyen
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
N OR-MAC-Nguyen
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MAC-Heinecke/Boehm
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
MAC-Pickard/Heinecke
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Barnes
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jessie has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history19 matches
L
Nicole Norby / Ying Dengchamps
2026-06-20 · MAC-Nguyen · #2 Doubles · with Lea Rodgers
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · with Lea Rodgers
+0.044better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Jinmi Kemple / Na Yung Yu
2026-05-30 · MAC-Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lo
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Robertson
+0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Eunhee Heller / Julia Reyes Andreu
2026-05-09 · MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lo
0.051below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Claudia Belindean / Delena Palena
2026-04-19 · MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andria Shirk
+0.018better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · with Nancy Lo
+0.034better than expected — took 55% of games against 41% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lo
+0.054better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
JEAN CHEN / Anne Larson
2026-03-07 · N OR-MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lea Rodgers
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-08 · N OR-MAC-Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milenka Coltman
0.017below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Jerin Boyer / Jill Boyer-Quick
2026-01-10 · N OR-MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Heinecke
+0.051better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Priscilla Paik / Chris Cormackmixed
2025-08-02 · MAC-Pickard/Heinecke · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Lo
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.