Search

Qiming Wang

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
77 matches · 46W–31L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
45 of 60
OR · 3.5
550 of 735

Qiming is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams19 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Qiming has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Qiming has gone from the 34th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.7% of games
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-07-25 · MPRC-Yu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trinna De Leon
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Henry Gerung / Patty Chenmixed
2026-07-18 · MPRC-Yu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yuxia Ouyang
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · MPRC-Yu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurence Dupray
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Rob Laing / Joseph M Heffernan III
2026-05-30 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Grant
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-23 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Anhaltzer
0.030below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Grant
+0.059better than expected — took 67% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandeep Mashru
0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Seth Wagner / Stefan Trinh
2026-04-18 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Agnihotri
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Matt Curtis / Christopher Graham
2026-03-29 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Anhaltzer
+0.019better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-20 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Atkins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Anhaltzer
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Atkins · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Matt Savage / Andrew Thorburn
2026-01-17 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Atkins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manoj Agnihotri
+0.021better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.