Search

Scott Keeney

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 26W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
32 of 39
WA · 3.5
976 of 1209

Scott is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams42 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Scott has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Scott has gone from the 78th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 52.1% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.7% of games
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.2% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-26 · THPRD-Feng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haihua Su
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haihua Su
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Feng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roksolana Shyyka
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tove Maloco
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Pickering
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · MAC-Wehner/Bourland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Omlid
+0.028better than expected — took 68% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-01-04 · MAC-Wehner/Bourland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Omlid
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-22 · LOTC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Leatherman
+0.042better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-08 · LOTC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Yang
0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Daniel M Kim / Doyoung Moon
2025-10-25 · LOTC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zachary Wright
0.047below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.