Search

Patty Chen

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
115 matches · 59W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
31 of 39
WA · 3.5
949 of 1209

Patty is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams61 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Patty has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Patty has gone from the 81st to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 50.6% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
56.9%
29W–22L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Gerung
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hoover Li
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Szueber
+0.010better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · WHRC-Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel M Kim
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · WHRC-Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chinwoo Kim
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Shaun Anderson / Ron Pressmixed
2026-04-17 · WHRC-Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jong Bum Park
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan McMullin
0.068below expectation — took 20% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · WHRC-Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chinwoo Kim
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Amy Patton / Mary McCarter
2026-03-07 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Szueber
+0.042better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Graham
0.021below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
+0.063better than expected — took 71% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-25 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.