Teams

MPRC-Yu

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Laurence Dupray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Lamone Voravongseng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jeff Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Josette Zervic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Xiaolin Nan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Qiming Wang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kathy Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Julie Ahn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Tommy Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Trinna De Leon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Reno Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Laurence Dupray
112W–69L career
0%58%42%
3.59
3.5
Lamone Voravongseng
82W–52L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Jeff Marshall
45W–60L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Josette Zervic
63W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Xiaolin Nan
42W–31L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Qiming Wang
46W–31L career
4%96%0%
3.17
3.5
Kathy Cook
85W–36L career
6%94%0%
3.17
3.5
Julie Ahn
66W–62L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Tommy Atkins
22W–53L career
14%86%0%
3.10
3.5
Trinna De Leon
0W–6L career · type S
22%78%0%
3.08
3
Reno Brown
24W–17L career
0%81%19%
3.00

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.