Search

Samina Panwhar

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
38 matches · 21W–17L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
42 of 52
OR · 3.0
457 of 600

Samina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Samina has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Samina has gone from the 23rd to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.7% of games
3.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Hazel
0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Vanessa Gebbie
2026-07-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.025below expectation — took 52% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Ryann Hulme / Shilpa Nanja
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Yutan
0.007about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Cynthia Novac-Yu / Ariana Tunmore
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with June Xiao
0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.082better than expected — took 75% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Nozomi Bray / Jennifer Yamin
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Hazel
+0.076better than expected — took 80% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Hazel
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Yutan
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 46% expected
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Rupali Avasare
0.023below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Betty Koon / Caroline Davidson
2026-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rupali Avasare
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Wendy Simons / Lora Lord
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Qin Lian
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Linda Ballard / Karen Moisant
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rupali Avasare
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.