← Search

Tracy Laidley

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 58W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tracy Laidley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-04-26 · IRV-Morris · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · Laidley · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · IRV-Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eryn Hoerster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Tracy Laidley - * / Fred Kowell
2026-03-27 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alana Miner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-26 · Laidley · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Sasek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-23 · Laidley · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-3
W
2026-02-22 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Quisling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-18 · IRV-Townsend/Cohen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Conners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · with Lucia Parker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.8% of games
3.0
47.8%
22W–24L · 51.1% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.1% of games
6.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert