Search

Valerie Neill

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
124 matches · 48W–76L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
182 of 357
OR · 3.0
307 of 600

Valerie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
PTC-Wagner/Oh
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
PTC-Kulak/Sinnott
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
PTC-Wagner/Oh
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
Neill-Make it a Doubles
2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2025
PTC-Wagner/Nguyen
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
PTC-Wagner/Simonsen
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Valerie has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Valerie has gone from the 2nd to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
44.3%
35W–44L · 49% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 34% of games
6.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
L
Kristina Baker / Nicole Norby
2026-06-07 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Davis
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jing Bennett / Leslie Bienen
2026-05-31 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Oh
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Monica Conners / Allison Ferre
2026-05-24 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nora Gray
0.020below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nora Gray
0.022about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Davis
0.021below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Vanessa Gebbie / Michelle Eastburn-Larsen
2026-03-22 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nora Gray
+0.005better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Oh
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
SHAWNA THOMPSON / Laura Berner
2026-02-08 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nora Gray
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Oh
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Priscilla Paik / Mark Laumixed
2025-11-16 · PTC-Kulak/Sinnott · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Nobleman
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-12 · PTC-Kulak/Sinnott · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erik Wilson
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Diana Cheng / Emily James
2025-06-23 · Neill-Make it a Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexis Nelson Knapp
0.054below expectation — took 37% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.