Search

Shannon Davis

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 44W–40L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
85%
stay 3.0
15%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
126 of 357
OR · 3.0
212 of 600

Shannon is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
PTC-Nguyen/Wagner
2027 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2027
PTC-Wagner/Oh
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
PTC-Wagner/Simonsen
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
PTC-Wagner/Oh
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
Neill-Make it a Doubles
2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2025
PTC-Wagner
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shannon has gone from the 30th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
53.7%
36W–31L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
Allison Ferre / Lucia Parker
2026-06-14 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lysa Morla Maxey
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Kristina Baker / Nicole Norby
2026-06-07 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Neill
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Asia Wagner
0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Marianne McIntosh / Bridghid McMonagle
2026-05-03 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Asia Wagner
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Neill
0.021below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gwen Kulak
0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Asia Wagner
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Deborah Self / Hiroe Felix
2026-01-30 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Wallace
+0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · PTC-Wagner/Oh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Asia Wagner
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Misug Kim / Daniel M Kimmixed
2025-11-16 · PTC-Wagner/Simonsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan de Leon
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-24 · PTC-Wagner/Simonsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Tse
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Martha Tolentino / Jaime Hamilton
2025-07-29 · Neill-Make it a Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Oh
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.